Random-effect summaries
Value
Data frame with one row per random-effect coefficient: term (the
group level, and the coefficient for a random slope), estimate, sd,
the 2.5% / 97.5% bounds conf.low / conf.high, and source (which
construction the row came from). sd and the bounds are NA on a backend
that reports a point per group (see Details).
Details
What each backend reports for a group effect follows what it computes:
Sampler tier and the RE-covariance Gibbs debias (
tulpa_re_cov_gibbs(), reached bytulpa(..., control = list(re_cov = "gibbs"))) draw the random effects jointly with everything else, soestimate/sd/ bounds are the empirical posterior summaries.The RE-covariance integrator (
tulpa_re_cov_nested()) carries a Gaussian per-group posterior at eachSigmanode; the reported summaries are the exact moments and quantiles of the weighted mixture of those, so they carry both the within-node curvature and theSigmauncertainty. A group effect the subspace debias selected (control$subspace_debias) is moved by the Metropolis sampler at every node instead, and is reported from those draws.The Laplace tier reports the conditional mode with no spread (
sdand the bounds areNA), which is the only per-group quantity it forms.
The source column says per row which of these produced it: "sampled" for
a posterior draw summary, "mixture" for the node mixture, "mode" for a
conditional mode.
A fit whose backend never forms a per-group posterior at all (the adaptive
Gauss-Hermite inner marginal integrates each group out by quadrature) errors
with that reason rather than returning an empty table, which would be
indistinguishable from a model with no random effects. A model that genuinely
has none returns a zero-row data frame.